𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The relevance of prostatectomy findings for brachytherapy selection in patients with localized prostate carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Thomas M. Pisansky; Michael L. Blute; David W. Hillman; Brian J. Davis; Michael G. Haddock; Vera J. Suman; Torrence M. Wilson; Horst Zincke


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
87 KB
Volume
95
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background:

The efficacy of brachytherapy for patients with localized prostate carcinoma depends on adequate radiotherapeutic coverage of the primary tumor and its subclinical extraprostatic extensions. predictive models based on pretherapy factors may be useful to estimate the likelihood for clinically relevant extraprostatic disease and may be incorporated into selection criteria for this procedure.

Methods:

Multivariate logistic regression model building was performed using pretherapy factors in 2905 surgically staged patients with localized prostate carcinoma to estimate the probability of seminal vesicle and/or lymph node involvement. bootstrap methods were employed to assess the stability of the final model parameters and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the final model.

Results:

Clinical tumor classification, biopsy gleason score groupings, and serum prostate specific antigen (psa) levels were associated with seminal vesicle and/or pelvic lymph node involvement. these factors were incorporated into a multivariate model that predicted for these adverse histopathologic features. allowing for up to a 10% likelihood for seminal vesicle and/or pelvic lymph node involvement, patients with tumors classified as t1c-t2a, gleason scores of 2-6, and psa < or = 16 ng/ml; or with tumors classified as t1c-t2a, gleason scores of 7-10, and psa < or = 4 ng/ml; or with tumors classified as t2b-t2c, gleason scores of 2-6, and psa < or = 6 ng/ml would be potential candidates for brachytherapy alone.

Conclusions:

The predictive model presented may provide criteria whereby an adequately performed prostate brachytherapy procedure is expected to encompass the intraprostatic and adjacent extraprostatic disease. prostate brachytherapy alone may be considered in these circumstances, whereas the addition of external beam radiotherapy may be reserved for patients with disease that is apt to extend beyond the brachytherapy target volume.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Biochemical outcome after radical prosta
✍ Anthony V. D'Amico; Richard Whittington; S. Bruce Malkowicz; Kerri Cote; Marian πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 92 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, consensus is lacking regarding the relative long‐term efficacy of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus conventional‐dose external beam radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. ## METHODS A

Assessment of outcome prediction models
✍ Anthony V. D'Amico; April Desjardin; Arnold Chung; Ming-Hui Chen; Delray Schultz πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 147 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

or neoadjuvant hormonal or radiation therapy were excluded. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwartz Bayesian Criterion (SBC) estimates, which are com-1 Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Harvard parative measures, were calculated for each clinical staging system. Pairwise com-Medical Scho

Prognostic factors for clinically locali
✍ Gunar K. Zagars; Alan Pollack; Andrew C. von Eschenbach πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 212 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The Uniirradiated in the PSA era. versity of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, ## METHODS. The authors analyzed the outcome for a group of 938 men with T1-T4,