The Relation Between Obtained Preference Value and Reinforcer Potency
✍ Scribed by Richard B. Graff; Jillian Larsen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 316 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1072-0847
- DOI
- 10.1002/bin.325
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Stimulus preference assessments often include items suspected to be highly preferred. If only high‐preference stimuli are assessed, preference hierarchies may not accurately predict the results of reinforcer assessments (RA). In this study, paired‐stimulus (PS) preference assessments using items suspected to be preferred (PS‐1) generated distinct preference hierarchies. Subsequent RAs (RA‐1) indicated that high‐preference and low‐preference stimuli were associated with similar response rates. Additional assessments (PS‐2) were then conducted, using the least‐preferred item from PS‐1 plus seven new stimuli. The least‐preferred items on PS‐1 ranked as most preferred on PS‐2, and on RA‐2, the top‐ranked items functioned as reinforcers, but low‐ranked items did not. Implications for incorporating low‐preference items into clinical/educational programming are discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The distinction between 'good as means' and 'intrinsic good' is a fundamental distinction in Moore's moral theory; the failure to see this distinction caused, according to him, much of 'the vast disagreements prevalent in Ethics'. However, it is not clear at all that Moore himself sees the implicati