A graph G is k-geodetically connected (k-GC) if it is connected and the removal of at least k vertices is required to increase the distance between at least one pair of vertices or reduce G to a single vertex. We completely characterize the class of minimum 3-GC graphs that have the fewest edges for
The recognition of geodetically connected graphs
β Scribed by Jou-Ming Chang; Chin-Wen Ho
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 849 KB
- Volume
- 65
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-0190
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Let G = ( y E) be a graph with vertex set V of size n and edge set E of size m. A vertex LJ E V is called a hinge vertex if the distance of any two vertices becomes longer after u is removed. A graph without hinge vertex is called a hinge-free graph. In general, a graph G is k-geodetically connected or k-GC for short if G can tolerate any k -1 vertices failures without increasing the distance among all the remaining vertices. In this paper, we show that recognizing a graph G to be k-GC for the largest value of k can be solved in O(nm) time. In addition, more efficient algorithms for recognizing the k-GC property on some special graphs are presented. These include the O(n + m) time algorithms on strongly chordal graphs (if a strong elimination ordering is given), ptolemaic graphs, and interval graphs, and an 0( n2) time algorithm on undirected path graphs (if a characteristic tree model is given). Moreover, we show that if the input graph G is not hinge-free then finding all hinge vertices of G can be solved in the same time complexity on the above classes of graphs. @
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A graph can be metrized by assigning a length to each of its edges. Such a graph is said to be geodetic if for each pair of vertices there is a unique geodesic joining them. It is said to be normally geodetic if each of these unique geodesics is one of the geodesics in the usual metrization of the g
We survey what is known on geodetic graphs of diameter two and discuss the implications of a new strong necessary condition for the existence of such graphs.