The reciprocation of unfavorable evaluations of performance in a two-person inspection task
β Scribed by H. C. Foot; J. M. Russon
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1975
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 471 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The extent to which subjects reciprocate unfavorable evaluations of performance was investigated in a dyadic inspection situation. The members of twelve male subject pairings alternated in their roles as βinspectorβ and βoperatorβ on a discrimination task. As operators, the subjects were led to believe that their inspectors had evaluated their performance favorably or unfavorably on the basis of either a subjective judgment or an objective matching evaluation criterion. Results showed that those operators who reciprocated most were those whose discriminations were rejected by means of the judgment criterion. This result is in line with the attribution hypothesis that a person is held more responsible for an act having an unfavorable outcome for others when that act is perceived as voluntary and intended than when it is perceived as compulsory or externally determined.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
There is a divergence of opinion regarding the existence of individual dierences in the use of intuition, ranging from intuition being the preserve of a creative minority to intuition as a basic cognitive process that is equally accessible to all. The existence and nature of individual dierences in
The performance of a task in the presence of others is a ubiquitous event, but the social determinants of performance have not been wholly delineated. It is still not clear
The present review examines studies which have reported on the performance of submerged operators on manual dexterity tasks in the practical arena of the open ocean underwater environment. The previous emphasis on the primacy of the factor situational anxiety, in degrading efficiency, is questioned.