✦ LIBER ✦

The ranking of laboratory animal carcinogens

✍ Scribed by James Hopkins

Book ID: 119159923
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1989
Tongue: English
Weight: 410 KB
Volume: 27
Category: Article
ISSN: 0278-6915
DOI: 10.1016/0278-6915(89)90152-x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Priority ranking of carcinogens in food

📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 120 KB

Carcinogenic effect of an antitumor drug

Carcinogenic effect of an antitumor drug etoposide in laboratory animals

✍ T. I. Fomina; V. M. Perelmuter; S. V. Vtorushin; M. V. Zavjalova; T. G. Borovska 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 669 KB

On use of the multistage dose–response m

On use of the multistage dose–response model for assessing laboratory animal carcinogenicity

✍ Daniela K. Nitcheva; Walter W. Piegorsch; R.Webster West 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 204 KB

LABORATORY APPROACHES TO THE IDENTIFICAT

LABORATORY APPROACHES TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF CARCINOGENS

✍ Richard R. Bates 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 670 KB

The validity of animal studies with chem

The validity of animal studies with chemical carcinogens

✍ Philippe Shubik 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 American Cancer Society 🌐 English ⚖ 454 KB

Effect of discounting certain tumor type

Effect of discounting certain tumor types/sites on evaluations of carcinogenicity in laboratory animals

✍ Myra Karstadt; Joseph K. Haseman 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 48 KB 👁 1 views

It has been suggested that, for mechanistic reasons, certain tumors found in experimental animals should be discounted when evaluating carcinogenic effects. The questioned tumors are: mouse liver, rat thyroid follicular cell, bladder and kidney (male rat), forestomach (mouse and rat, gavage route),