The Radiographic Diagnosis of Sacroiliitis
β Scribed by Lawrence M. Ryan; Guillermo F. Carrera; Robert W. Lightfoot Jr.; Raymond G. Hoffman; Franklin Kozin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 360 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3591
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Conventional radiography is the standard method of objectively identifying sacroiliitis. Single views of the sacroiliac joints can be unequivocally interpreted in 70430% of patients with low back pain. A series of views usually correctly resolves the ambiguity in the remaining 2 0 3 0 % of patients (67% correct). Computed tomography will be helpful in the few patients in whom a series of views produces equivocal interpretation.
History (1). physical examination (2,3), scintigraphy (4-6), plain radiography, and computed tomography (CT) (7,8) are all imperfect methods of identifying that proportion of patients with low back pain who have sacroiliitis. Plain radiography remains the most widely accepted and accessible means of objectively and certainly identifying sacroiliitis. We have studied a series of patients who complained of low back pain, in order to refine our use of plain radiography and assess
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In a recent article by , the authors report a kindred in which the females had skeletal changes characteristic of Melnick-Needles syndrome (MNS), whereas males born to those women exhibited lethal congenital anomalies consistent with otopalato-digital syndrome II (OPDII). The radiographic documenta
## Abstract ## Objective In routine practice, diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA) currently relies on the combination of conventional risk factors and the presence of cardinal signs and symptoms. However, their role in early diagnosis has received little attention compared with biomarker researc