𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind

✍ Scribed by Gregory J. Feist


Book ID
127430123
Publisher
Yale University Press
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
1 MB
Category
Library
ISBN
0300143273

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In this book, Gregory Feist reviews and consolidates the scattered literatures on the psychology of science, then calls for the establishment of the field as a unique discipline. He offers the most comprehensive perspective yet on how science came to be possible in our species and on the important role of psychological forces in an individual’s development of scientific interest, talent, and creativity. Without a psychological perspective, Feist argues, we cannot fully understand the development of scientific thinking or scientific genius.
The author explores the major subdisciplines within psychology as well as allied areas, including biological neuroscience and developmental, cognitive, personality, and social psychology, to show how each sheds light on how scientific thinking, interest, and talent arise. He assesses which elements of scientific thinking have their origin in evolved mental mechanisms and considers how humans may have developed the highly sophisticated scientific fields we know today. In his fascinating and authoritative book, Feist deals thoughtfully with the mysteries of the human mind and convincingly argues that the creation of the psychology of science as a distinct discipline is essential to deeper understanding of human thought processes.

✦ Subjects


Психология инженерно-технического и научного творчества


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The mechanization of the mind: On the or
✍ John D. Greenwood 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB 👁 2 views

BOOK REVIEWS constructionism is not cited, nor is Ian Hacking's work on the looping effects of human kinds. Jill Morawski's study of reflexive practices in American psychology is also absent. That the book does not even reference the work of Michel Foucault -arguably the most influential critic of t