✦ LIBER ✦

The PROWESS SHOCK trial: reply to Paramesh et al.

✍ Scribed by Simon Finfer; V. Marco Ranieri; B. Taylor Thompson; Philip S. Barie; Jean-François Dhainaut; Ivor S. Douglas; Bengt Gårdlund; John C. Marshall; Andrew Rhodes

Book ID: 105835660
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 82 KB
Volume: 35
Category: Article
ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1390-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Cox et al. and Moorlock

✍ Alastair Ruffell; Paul Wignall 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 The Geological Society (London) 🌐 English ⚖ 219 KB

Reply to Letter to the Editor: Osland et

Reply to Letter to the Editor: Osland et al.

✍ S. J. Lewis 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 54 KB

Letter to the Editor: reply to Magalhães

Letter to the Editor: reply to Magalhães et al.

✍ Philip D. Harvey 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB

Letter to the editor: Reply to Nysom et

Letter to the editor: Reply to Nysom et al.

✍ Ilhan, Inci; Sarialioglu, Faik; Bilgiç, Hayati 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 22 KB 👁 2 views

We have read the article by Nysom et al. [1] entitled, ''Risk Factors for Reduced Pulmonary Function After Malignant Lymphoma in Childhood.'' It would seem that somehow Dr. Nysom et al. have misinterpreted the results reported by us [2] in that they claim that we ''found normal or better than normal

Reply to the letter from Avenell et al.

✍ Alan Shenkin 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 143 KB

Reply to the letter by Hori et al

✍ Barkholt, L; Hentschke, P; Ringdén, O 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB