𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

The Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem

✍ Scribed by Boston N.


Year
2003
Tongue
English
Leaves
140
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This book will describe the recent proof of Fermat's Last Theorem by Andrew Wiles, aided by Richard Taylor, for graduate students and faculty with a reasonably broad background in algebra. It is hard to give precise prerequisites but a first course in graduate algebra, covering basic groups, rings, and fields together with a passing acquaintance with number rings and varieties should suffice. Algebraic number theory (or arithmetical geometry, as the subject is more commonly called these days) has the habit of taking last year's major result and making it background taken for granted in this year's work. Peeling back the layers can lead to a maze of results stretching back over the decades.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fermat's Last Theorem: The Proof
✍ Takeshi Saito πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2014 πŸ› American Mathematical Society 🌐 English

This is the second volume of the book on the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem by Wiles and Taylor (the first volume is published in the same series; see MMONO/243). Here the detail of the proof announced in the first volume is fully exposed. The book also includes basic materials and constructions in

Fermat's Last Theorem: The Proof
✍ Takeshi Saito πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2014 πŸ› American Mathematical Society 🌐 English

This is the second volume of the book on the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem by Wiles and Taylor (the first volume is published in the same series; see MMONO/243). Here the detail of the proof announced in the first volume is fully exposed. The book also includes basic materials and constructions in

The Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem by R
✍ Faltings G. πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1995 🌐 English

The proof of the conjecture mentioned in the title was finally completed in September of 1994. A. Wiles announced this result in the summer of 1993; however, there was a gap in his work. The paper of Taylor and Wiles does not close this gap but circumvents it. This article is an adaptation of severa