The prognostic significance of margin width for extremity and trunk sarcoma
β Scribed by Mark D. Mc Kee; Dong Feng Liu; John J. Brooks; John F. Gibbs; Deborah L. Driscoll; William G. Kraybill
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 108 KB
- Volume
- 85
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background and Objectives
To evaluate the significance of resection margin for soft tissue sarcoma (STS), we determined local recurrenceβfree interval (LRFI), distant metastasesβfree interval (DMFI), and overall survival (OS) for primary extremity and truncal STS with clear margins (β₯10 mm), close margins (1β9 mm), and positive margins (0 mm).
Methods
Patients were evaluated via review of charts and tumor specimens.
Results
Among 111 patients, tumors were predominantly high grade (86%), β₯5 cm (76%), and deep (81%). A minority of patients received adjuvant radiation (38%) and/or adjuvant chemotherapy (34%). Margin width was β₯10 mm (48%), 1β9 mm (40%), or 0 mm (12%). Margins β₯10 mm were less common for large (Pβ=β0.009) or deep (Pβ=β0.02) tumors. By multivariate analysis, independent factors for LRFI were tumor size (Pβ=β0.04) and margin width (Pβ=β0.03). Independent factors related to DMFI were tumor grade (Pβ=β0.002), size (Pβ=β0.007), and patient age (Pβ=β0.02). Independent factors relating to OS were tumor grade (Pβ=β0.001), size (Pβ=β0.004), and depth (Pβ=β0.03).
Conclusions
Margins β₯10 mm independently predicted longer LRFI and are optimal for extremity STS resection. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered for all STS resected with margins <10 mm, and margin width should be considered when reporting and interpreting LR outcomes for these patients. J. Surg. Oncol. 2004;85:68β76. Β© 2004 WileyβLiss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: The predictive value of histologic grading and staging systems for overall survival in different types of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk is unclear. ## Methods: Histologic slides from 193 patients with primary tumors were reviewed for diagnosis, and ki-67 (m
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: In soft tissue sarcoma, better distinction of highβrisk and lowβrisk patients is needed to individualize treatment and improve survival. Prognostic systems used in clinical practice identify highβrisk patients based on various factors, including age, tumor size and depth
## Background: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma (scc) of the skin may exhibit locally advanced or metastatic disease and present a challenging management problem. ## Methods: A retrospective review of 40 patients with advanced scc of the trunk or extremity managed at roswell park cancer inst