A cycle-path cover of a digraph D is a spanning subgraph made of disjoint cycles and paths. In order to count such covers by types we introduce the cyclepath indicator polynomial of D. We show that this polynomial can be obtained by a deletion-contraction recurrence relation. Then we study some spec
The Path-Cycle Symmetric Function of a Digraph
โ Scribed by Timothy Y. Chow
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 885 KB
- Volume
- 118
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0001-8708
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Introduction
Recently, Stanley [21] has defined a symmetric function generalization of the chromatic polynomial of a graph. Independently, Chung and Graham have defined a digraph polynomial called the cover polynomial which is closely related to the chromatic polynomial of a graph (in fact, as we shall see, the cover polynomial of a certain digraph associated to a poset P coincides with the chromatic polynomial of the incomparability graph of P) and also to rook polynomials. The starting point for the present paper is the suggestion in Chung and Graham's paper that the cover polynomial might generalize to a symmetric function in much the same way that the chromatic polynomial does. This is indeed the case, and in this paper we shall study this symmetric function generalization of the cover polynomial. As one would expect, there are a number of generalizations and analogues of known results about the cover polynomial, the rook polynomial, and Stanley's chromatic symmetric function. In addition, however, we will obtain some unexpected dividends, such as a combinatorial reciprocity theorem that answers a question of Chung and Graham and ties together a number of known results that previously seemed unrelated Theorem 7.3], [19, Chapter 7, Theorem 2], [21, Theorem 4.2], [23, Theorem 3.2]), and a new symmetric function basis that appears to be a natural counterpart of the polynomial basis ( x+n d ) n=0, ..., d . One reason for these unexpected results is that this topic lies at the intersection of several branches of combinatorics; their interaction naturally gives rise to new connections and ideas. We shall indicate several directions for further research in this potentially very rich area of study.
2. Definitions and Basic Facts
In this paper, the unadorned term graph will mean a finite simple undirected graph and the term digraph will mean a finite directed graph article no. 0018 71
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Cayley graphs arise naturally in computer science, in the study of word-hyperbolic groups and automatic groups, in change-ringing, in creating Escher-like repeating patterns in the hyperbolic plane, and in combinatorial designs. Moreover, Babai has shown that all graphs can be realized as an induced
Let C = (V, E) be a digraph wl,th n vertices. Let f be a function from E illto the real numbem, associating with each edg~t: e EE a weight f(e). Given any sequence of edges 0 = el, e2, , . . , ep define w(a), the wei@ of a, as CyS 1 f(q), and define m(o), the mean weight of u, as w(a)&. Let A\* ==mi
the vertices of a digraph by cycles of prescribed length, Discrete Mathematics 87 (
Two circuits C~ and C 2 in a digraph are called consistent circuits if and only if their intersection is either empty, a singleton or a subpath of both C~ and C 2. It is proved that Every finite strongly connected digraph of G of stability at most 2 is spanned by two consistent circuits. As a conseq