𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

The Paradoxes of Posterity

✍ Scribed by Benjamin Hoffmann; Alan J. Singerman


Publisher
Penn State University Press
Year
2020
Tongue
English
Leaves
178
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The impetus for literary creation has often been explained as an attempt to transcend the mortality of the human condition through a work addressed to future generations. Failing to obtain literal immortality, or to turn their hope towards the spiritual immortality promised by religious systems, literary creators seek a symbolic form of perpetuity granted to the intellectual side of their person in the memory of those not yet born while they write. In this book, Benjamin Hoffmann illuminates the paradoxes inherent in the search for symbolic immortality, arguing that the time has come to find a new answer to the perennial question: Why do people write?

Exploring the fields of digital humanities and book history, Hoffmann describes posterity as a network of interconnected memories that constantly evolves by reserving a variable and continuously renegotiated place for works and authors of the past. In other words, the perpetual safeguarding of texts is delegated to a collectivity not only nonexistent at the moment when a writer addresses it, but whose nature is characterized by impermanence and instability. Focusing on key works by Denis Diderot, Γ‰tienne-Maurice Falconet, Giacomo Casanova, FranΓ§ois-RenΓ© de Chateaubriand, and Jean-Paul Sartre, Hoffmann considers the authors’ representations of posterity, the representation of authors by posterity, and how to register and preserve works in the network of memories. In doing so, Hoffmann reveals the three great paradoxes in the quest for symbolic immortality: the paradoxes of belief, of identity, and of mediation.

Theoretically sophisticated and convincingly argued, this book contends that there is only one truly serious literary problem: the transmission of texts to posterity. It will appeal to specialists in literature, in particular eighteenth-century French literature, as well as scholars and students of philosophy and book history.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Paradoxes of Prosperity
✍ Lorman A. Ratner, Paula T. Kaufman, Dwight L. Teeter Jr. πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› University of Illinois Press 🌐 English
Paradoxia Epidemica: The Renaissance Tra
✍ Rosalie Littell Colie πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1966 πŸ› Princeton University Press 🌐 English

<i>Paradoxia Epidemica</i>is a broad-ranging critical study of Renaissance thought, showing how the greatest writers of the period from Erasmus and Rabelais to Donne, Milton, and Shakespeare made conscious use of paradox not only as a figure of speech but as a mode of thought, a way of perceiving th

Paradoxia Epidemica: The Renaissance Tra
✍ Rosalie Littell Colie πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2015 πŸ› Princeton University Press 🌐 English

<p><i>Paradoxia Epidemica</i> is a broad-ranging critical study of Renaissance thought, showing how the greatest writers of the period from Erasmus and Rabelais to Donne, Milton, and Shakespeare made conscious use of paradox not only as a figure of speech but as a mode of thought, a way of perceivin

The Prosperity Paradox
✍ Clayton M Christensen, Efosa Ojomo, Karen Dillon πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2018 πŸ› HarperCollins 🌐 English

Clayton M. Christensen, the author of such business classics as The Innovator’s Dilemma and the New York Times bestseller How Will You Measure Your Life, and co-authors Efosa Ojomo and Karen Dillon reveal why so many investments in economic development fail to generate sustainable prosperity, and of

The Prosperity Paradox
✍ Clayton M Christensen, Efosa Ojomo, Karen Dillon πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2018 πŸ› HarperCollins 🌐 English

Clayton M. Christensen, the author of such business classics as The Innovator’s Dilemma and the New York Times bestseller How Will You Measure Your Life, and co-authors Efosa Ojomo and Karen Dillon reveal why so many investments in economic development fail to generate sustainable prosperity, and of