𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The Optimal Alphabetic Tree Problem Revisited

✍ Scribed by Lawrence L Larmore; Teresa M Przytycka


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
202 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0196-6774

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The Optimal Alphabetic Binary Tree OABT problem is equivalent to the Optimal Binary Search Tree problem where the weights are associated only with Ε½ . the leaves. The problem can be solved in O n log n time, while the best known Ε½ . lower bound is ⍀ n .

In this paper we relate the complexity of the problem to the complexity of Ε½ Ε½ . . priority queue operations and the complexity of sorting. We give O n log P k -time Ε½ Ε½ .

. algorithm for the general OABT problem an O S n log k -time algorithm for ' the integer OABT problem where k is a number at most at large as the number of Ε½ . local minima, P k is the time complexity of priority queue insertrdelete min Ε½ . operation, and S n is the complexity of sorting in the given domain of weights. Our algorithms also give rise to linear time algorithms for some special cases.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The eponym problem revisited
✍ Claude H. Organ Jr. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 54 KB
The Push Tree problem
✍ FrΓ©dΓ©ric Havet; Marc Wennink πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 165 KB
Solving Steiner tree problems in graphs
✍ Koch, T.; Martin, A. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 261 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

In this paper, we present the implementation of a branch-and-cut algorithm for solving Steiner tree problems in graphs. Our algorithm is based on an integer programming formulation for directed graphs and comprises preprocessing, separation algorithms, and primal heuristics. We are able to solve nea

The Automorphism Tower Problem Revisited
✍ Winfried Just; Saharon Shelah; Simon Thomas πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 236 KB

It is well known that the automorphism towers of infinite centreless groups of cardinality } terminate in less than (2 } ) + steps. But an easy counting argument shows that (2 } ) + is not the best possible bound. However, in this paper, we will show that it is impossible to find an explicit better