✦ LIBER ✦

The OAQPS control cost manual vs. Levelized cost method

✍ Scribed by Vatavuk, William M.

Book ID: 102835333
Publisher: American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 655 KB
Volume: 19
Category: Article
ISSN: 0278-4491
DOI: 10.1002/ep.670190414

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Control Transmutation Method and the

The Control Transmutation Method and the Cost of Fast Controls

✍ Miller, Luc 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB

Automated vs. Manual Spinal Cord Stimula

Automated vs. Manual Spinal Cord Stimulator Adjustment: A Sensitivity Analysis of Lifetime Cost Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial

✍ Alexander A. Khalessi; Rod S. Taylor; David Brigham; Richard B. North 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB

The Incidence of Water Pollution Control

The Incidence of Water Pollution Control Costs: Partial vs. General Equilibrium Computations

✍ JAMES S. SHORTLE; KEITH D. WILLETT 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 694 KB

The cost/accuracy approach: a method for

The cost/accuracy approach: a method for selecting filming rate for manual materials handling activities

✍ S. Kromodihardjo; A. Mital 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 276 KB

Automated vs. manual cerebrospinal fluid

Automated vs. manual cerebrospinal fluid cell counts: a work and cost analysis comparing the Sysmex XE-5000 and the Fuchs–Rosenthal manual counting chamber

✍ M. ZIMMERMANN; K. RUPRECHT; F. KAINZINGER; F. L. HEPPNER; A. WEIMANN 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 289 KB

The impact of using different costing me

The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross-costing approaches

✍ Fiona M. Clement (Nee Shrive); William A. Ghali; Cam Donaldson; Braden J. Manns 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 267 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract __Background__: Published guidelines on the conduct of economic evaluations provide little guidance regarding the use and potential bias of the different costing methods. __Objectives__: Using microcosting and two gross‐costing methods, we (1) compared the cost estimates within and acr