๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial. An overview of results during the first phase of recruitment

โœ Scribed by Guglielmo Ronco; Silvia Brezzi; Francesca Carozzi; Paolo Dalla Palma; Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Daria Minucci; Carlo Naldoni; Nereo Segnan; Marco Zappa; Manuel Zorzi; Jack Cuzick


Book ID
113961204
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
116 KB
Volume
107
Category
Article
ISSN
0090-8258

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The impact of new technologies in cervic
โœ Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Nereo Segnan; Marco Zappa; Carlo Naldoni; Manuel Zorzi; Mass ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 90 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract The decision to introduce liquidโ€based cytology (LBC) and HPV as screening tests involves criteria based on resource consumption. We used crossโ€sectional data at recruitment from the NTCC trial [ISRCTN81678807] on 28,000 women aged 35โ€“60, randomised to receive a conventional Pap test or

Prospective and randomised public-health
โœ Pekka Nieminen; Matti Hakama; Merja Viikki; Jussi Tarkkanen; Ahti Anttila ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 73 KB

## Abstract Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and relative validity of interactive neural network assisted screening (Papnet) in primary mass screening for cervical cancer as a public health policy (routine screening). A randomized, ongoing trial involved 152,969 invitees and 108,686 at

Accuracy of liquid-based cytology : Comp
โœ Massimo Confortini; Christine Bergeron; Mina Desai; Giovanni Negri; Paolo Dalla ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) ๐ŸŒ English โš– 119 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: In the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening (NTCC) randomized controlled trial, no significant increase in the sensitivity of liquidโ€based cytology (LBC) was observed compared with conventional cytology. Both were interpreted by cytologists who had limited prev