𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The necessary condition for a Runge-Kutta scheme to be symplectic for Hamiltonian systems

✍ Scribed by Y.-F. Tang


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
411 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0898-1221

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In

this paper, beginning with the expansion of a Runge-Kutta scheme (Lemma l), the author introduces the so-called Y-T-type array for each irreducible one (Lemmss 2-3). As a study of the properties of Y-T-type arrays, the author establishes Lemmas 4-5, and then the key Theorem 1. The interesting Theorem 2 is concluded from Lemma 1. The last result (Theorem 3) is obtained from Theorem 2 and Theorem 1; thus the author solves the hard problem on the necessary condition for a Runge-Kutta scheme to be symplectic for Hamiltonian systems. Hence, a sufficient and necessary condition is given. Finally, Remark 1 is given as a necessary supplement of Theorem 3.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Quasi-Hamiltonicity: A Series of Necessa
✍ Gregory Gutin; Anders Yeo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 129 KB

We introduce new necessary conditions, k-quasi-hamiltonicity (0 k n&1), for a digraph of order n to be hamiltonian. Every (k+1)-quasi-hamiltonian digraph is also k-quasi-hamiltonian; we construct digraphs which are k-quasi-hamiltonian, but not (k+1)-quasi-hamiltonian. We design an algorithm that che

A necessary and sufficient condition for
✍ Zhou Huai-Lu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 272 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

We prove the following conjecture of Broersma and Veldman: A connected, locally k-connected K,,-free graph is k-hamiltonian if and only if it is (k + 2)-connected ( k L 1). We use [ 11 for basic terminology and notation, and consider simple graphs only. Let G be a graph. By V(G) and E(G) we denote,