𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The natural landscape metaphor in information visualization: The role of commonsense geomorphology

✍ Scribed by Sara Irina Fabrikant; Daniel R. Montello; David M. Mark


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
685 KB
Volume
61
Category
Article
ISSN
1532-2882

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The landscape metaphor was one of the first methods used by the information visualization community to reorganize and depict document archives that are not inherently spatial. The motivation for the use of the landscape metaphor is that everyone intuitively understands landscapes. We critically examine the information visualization designer's ontologies for implementing spatialized landscapes with ontologies of the geographic domain held by lay people. In the second half of the article, we report on a qualitative study where we empirically assessed whether the landscape metaphor has explanatory power for users trying to make sense of spatialized views, and if so, in what ways. Specifically, we are interested in uncovering how lay people interpret hills and valleys in an information landscape, and whether their interpretation is congruent with the current scientific understanding of geomorphologic processes. Our empirical results suggest that neither developers' nor lay users' understanding of terrain visualizations is based on universal understanding of the true process that has shaped a natural landscape into hills and valleys, mountains, and canyons. Our findings also suggest that the information landscape metaphor for sense making of a document collection is not self‐evident to lay users, as claimed by information landscape designers. While a deep understanding of geomorphology will probably not be required to successfully use an information landscape, we do suggest that a coherent theory on how people use space will be necessary to produce cognitively useful information visualizations.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Communicating through pictures and words
✍ Jane Z. Sojka; Joan L. Giese 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 319 KB

The interaction of affect and cognition was explored as four types of processor groups (high affect/low cognition, low affect/high cognition, high affect/high cognition, and low affect/low cognition) and investigated in terms of responses to a visual stimulus, a verbal stimulus, and a combination vi