✦ LIBER ✦

THE MONOCRITICS AND CONSEQUENTIALISM

✍ Scribed by Sharon Horton

Book ID: 124828396
Year: 1991
Weight: 152 KB
Volume: 8
Category: Article
ISSN: 0742-3640
DOI: 10.2307/20751646

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Consequences, opportunities, and general

Consequences, opportunities, and generalized consequentialism and non-consequentialism

✍ Kotaro Suzumura; Yongsheng Xu 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB

Terrorism and consequentialism

✍ Burleigh T. Wilkins 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 605 KB

In discussions of terrorism one would expect to encounter a significant division between consequentialists on the one hand and deontologists on the other. One would expect to find consequentialists arguing that terrorism could be justified if, on balance, it advanced the cause of the good over alter

Friendship and Consequentialism

✍ Conee, E. 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 94 KB

Consequentialism and Commitment

✍ Alastair Norcross 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 98 KB

Consequentialism and absolutism

✍ Elliot, Robert 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 472 KB

Teleology, consequentialism, and the pas

Teleology, consequentialism, and the past

✍ Peter Vallentyne 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 760 KB

Act teleological theories are theories that judge an action permissible just in case its outcome is maximally good) It is usually assumed that act teleological theories cannot be past-regarding, i.e., make the permissibility of actions depend on what the past was like (e.g., on what promises were ma