This study examined the relationships among spiritual well-being, quality of life, and psychological adjustment in 142 women diagnosed with breast cancer who were participating in a larger study designed to compare the efficacy of two psychosocial support programs. Participants were given a set of q
The Moderating Relationship of Spirituality on Negative Life Events and Psychological Adjustment
β Scribed by J. SCOTT YOUNG; CRAIG S. CASHWELL; JULIA SHCHERBAKOVA
- Publisher
- American Counseling Association
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 529 KB
- Volume
- 45
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0160-7960
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The authors used a path model to examine how spirituality moderates relationships between negative life experiences and psychological adjustment, operationalized for this study as levels of depression and anxiety. Results suggest that spirituality provides a significant moderating effect for both depression and anxiety. The moderating effect was stronger for depression than for anxiety.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The present study examined the unique and interactive effects of stress and problemβsolving skills on suicidal behaviors among 102 inpatient adolescents. As expected, life event stress and chronic stress each significantly predicted suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. Problem solving
## Abstract The relationships of stressful and of positive events to treatment response for depression have typically been studied separately using methods based on the rates of events and ultimate remission status. A novel dataβanalytic approach was introduced that addresses the limitations of the
## Abstract The present study examined whether employees high in negative affectivity (NA) are destined to experience strain at a higher level than those low in NA. We used data collected from 230 employees to investigate the moderating effects of political skill, as a form of interpersonal control
Following publication of this paper in the September-October 1999 issue of Psycho-Oncology (8:(5), 429-438), it came to our attention that the authors' institutions were incorrect. Ms Cotton and Ms Fitzpatrick are at the