The mental adjustment to cancer scale—a psychometric analysis and the concept of coping
✍ Scribed by Karin Nordin; Gunilla Berglund; Ingrid Terje; Bengt Glimelius
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 74 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9249
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A psychometric analysis of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale was performed in a heterogeneous Swedish sample of cancer patients (n=868). The homogeneity of the original subscales proved to be satisfactory (h coefficients 0.61 -0.81). The sample was randomly split into two subgroups, and a factor analysis was carried out in one of them using the LISREL 8.20 procedure. This yielded four factors called 'Hopeless', 'Positive', 'Anxious' and 'Avoidant' including 28 of the 40 original items (h coefficients 0.58 -0.81). The novel factor structure was cross-validated and confirmed in the second subgroup. In contrast to the original scale (one item), 'Avoidance', was indexed by three items. The distinction between mental adjustment and coping is discussed. It is concluded that both versions of the MAC scale are measures of mental adjustment including emotional reactions as well as coping.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The validity and reliability of two factor structures of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale for assessing coping style was assessed by examining the relationship between the subscales, psychological distress, and quality of life (QOL) among Stage II and Stage IV breast cancer patients in fo
## METHODS. A systematic replication of the 1993 study by Cella et al., in which lington, Vermont. FACT-G was developed, was employed to assess the reliability, validity, and factor 2 Department of Nursing, Maine Medical Center, structure of the scale. Portland, Maine. ## RESULTS. The reliabil
The present study used structural equation modeling to examine the relationships among disease stage (i.e. Stage II versus Stage IV), age, coping style, and psychological adjustment in 100 women diagnosed with breast cancer. Five separate models were examined: a full model, a mediational model, a de
1. Geomorphological models developed from studies of alluvial river channel processes can be used to predict river channel response to restoration. These models suggest that restoration can significantly affect modified and unmodified reaches downstream, and that sediment yields from these reaches m