## Abstract ## Background The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) has been suggested as a possible __in vivo__ measure of central serotonin function. However, more recent studies suggest that the LDAEP may be modulated by multiple neuromodulatory systems in addition to the
The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) as an in vivo biomarker of central serotonergic function in humans: rationale, evaluation and review of findings
✍ Scribed by Barry V. O'Neill; Rodney J. Croft; Pradeep J. Nathan
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 233 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6222
- DOI
- 10.1002/hup.940
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Objectives
The loudness dependence of the auditory evoked potential (LDAEP) has been proposed as a valid means of non‐invasively assessing in vivo central serotonin (5‐hydroxytryptamine, 5‐HT) function in humans. The specificity and sensitivity of the LDAEP to changes in 5‐HT neurotransmission have recently been explored directly in a number of pharmacological and genetic studies. Subsequently, this review was undertaken in an attempt to critically evaluate the potential role of the LDAEP as a marker of the central 5‐HT function.
Design
Findings from clinical, experimental animal and human studies examining the relationship between the LDAEP and the 5‐HT system as well as other neurochemical systems including dopaminergic, glutamatergic and the cholinergic systems were reviewed.
Results
The majority of evidence for an association between the LDAEP and 5‐HT has come from animal studies. Indirect studies in clinical disorders of presumed serotonergic dysfunction have been circumstantial and inconsistent with more recent investigations utilising direct genetic association studies also providing conflicting reports. Pharmacological studies in humans provide overwhelming evidence that the LDAEP is insensitive to acute changes in 5‐HT function, with additional evidence outlining sensitivity to other neurotransmitter systems including the glutamatergic system.
Conclusions
The available evidence suggests that the LDAEP lacks sensitivity and specificity to acute changes in serotonergic neurotransmission. Overall the findings do not provide strong support for its utility as a marker of central 5‐HT function. However the LDAEP shows more promise as a potential predictor of antidepressant treatment response and this predictive ability may provide the basis for future research involving the LDAEP. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES