The Logic of Real Arguments

✍ Scribed by Alec Fisher

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Leaves: 238
Edition: 2nd
Category: Library

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

This new and expanded edition explains a distinctive method for analyzing and evaluating arguments. It features many examples, ranging from newspaper articles to extracts from classic texts, and from easy passages to much more difficult ones. It will enable students to think critically about sustained, theoretical arguments commonly encountered in the course of their studies, including arguments about the natural world, society, policy, and philosophy.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Inside Arguments: Logic and the Study of

📁 Inside Arguments: Logic and the Study of Argumentation

✍ Henrique Jales Ribeiro 📂 Library 📅 2012 🏛 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 🌐 English

This volume includes a collection of eighteen essays that provide a decisive input to the study of logic and argumentation theory by some of the finest specialists in these areas, covering the main schools of thought and contemporary trends in the beginning of the 21st century. In these essays, the

The Logic of Legal Argumentation

📁 The Logic of Legal Argumentation

✍ Marko Novak; 📂 Library 📅 2024 🏛 Routledge 🌐 English

Multi-modal argumentation with its logical, emotional, visceral and kisceral arguments is an important addition to logical argumentation, especially when real-life situations are considered. It does not discard logic but adds other modes of argumentation to complement it, to emphasize the realistic

On the Logic of the Ontological Argument

📁 On the Logic of the Ontological Argument

📂 Fiction

The Logical Structure of Anselm's Argume

📁 The Logical Structure of Anselm's Arguments

📂 Fiction

Handbook of the Logic of Argument and In

📁 Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference

✍ Gabbay Et Al 📂 Library 📅 2002 🌐 English

Logical Models of Legal Argumentation

📁 Logical Models of Legal Argumentation

✍ Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor (auth.), Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor (eds.) 📂 Library 📅 1997 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p>In the study of forms of legal reasoning, logic and argumentation theory long followed separate tracks. `Legal logicians' tended to focus on a deductive reconstruction of justifying a decision, disregarding the dialectical process leading to the chosen justification. Others instead emphasized the