𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

The Logic of Intelligence Analysis: Why Hypothesis Testing Matters

✍ Scribed by Karl Spielmann


Publisher
Routledge
Year
2018
Tongue
English
Leaves
119
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Table of Contents


Cover
Half Title
Book Title
Copyright
Table of Contents
List of illustrations
Tables
Boxes
Preface: revisiting an old problemβ€”new concerns, new remedies
Notes
Bibliography
1 Maybe it’s time for something different
An insider’s perspective on the problem
The logic of intelligence analysis: back to basics
Some special challenges for alternative hypothesis testing
The case for alternative methodology testing
Chances for change?
Notes
Bibliography
2 Strengthening intelligence threat analysis
Alternative analysis
Falling short of potential
Accepting the conventional wisdom
Enhanced analytic techniques
Technique one: prudently stretch analytic imagination by testing many hypotheses
Technique two: independently check source vetting to better detect deception
Technique three: systematically assess missing data to better determine validity and detect foreign denial
Technique four: make a common sense start with a zero-based review of a dominant view’s evidence and reasoning
Putting the techniques together: a coherent process to assess and predict threats
Notes
Bibliography
3 Using enhanced analytic techniques for threat analysis: a case study illustration
A hypothetical case study to show how enhanced analytic techniques can be used
The zero-based review in the hypothetical scenario
A dominant view’s data support: what a zero-based review can show
The new inconsistency test in the hypothetical scenario
The missing data test in the hypothetical scenario
Taking it from here
Notes
Bibliography
4 I got algorithm: can there be a Nate Silver in intelligence?
Eight challenges for statistical probability analysis as a threat analysis tool
Judging the prospects for statistical probability analysis as a threat analysis tool
The heart of the matter: improving intelligence prediction
Are practical steps enough to improve prediction or is computer help needed?
Notes
Bibliography
Index


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis:
✍ Martha Whitesmith πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2022 πŸ› Edinburgh University Press 🌐 English

<h4>Tests whether the analysis of competing hypotheses reduces cognitive bias, and proposes a more effective approach</h4> <ul><li>Reveals that a key element of current training provided to the UK and US intelligence communities (and likely all 5-EYES and several European agencies) does not have a p

Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis:
✍ Martha Whitesmith πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› Edinburgh University Press 🌐 English

Tests whether the analysis of competing hypotheses reduces cognitive bias, and proposes a more effective approach Reveals that a key element of current training provided to the UK and US intelligence communities (and likely all 5-EYES and several European agencies) does not have a proven ability to

Cognitive Bias in Intelligence Analysis:
✍ Martha Whitesmith πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2020 πŸ› Edinburgh University Press 🌐 English

Tests whether the analysis of competing hypotheses reduces cognitive bias, and proposes a more effective approach Reveals that a key element of current training provided to the UK and US intelligence communities (and likely all 5-EYES and several European agencies) does not have a proven ability to

The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy:
✍ Matthew Kroenig πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2018 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

For decades, the reigning scholarly wisdom about nuclear weapons policy has been that the United States only needs the ability to absorb an enemy nuclear attack and still be able to respond with a devastating counterattack. So long as the US, or any other nation, retains such an assured retaliation

The logic of American nuclear strategy:
✍ Kroenig, Matthew πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2018 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

"What kind of nuclear strategy and posture does the United States need to defend itself and its allies? According to a longstanding, academic conventional wisdom, the answer to this question is straightforward: the United States needs the ability to absorb an enemy nuclear attack and respond with a