𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Cover of the logic of hegel
πŸ“

the logic of hegel


Tongue
English
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The Logic of Hegel's Logic: An Introduct
✍ John W. Burbidge πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Broadview Press 🌐 English

George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel has seldom been considered a major figure in the history of logic. His two texts on logic, both called The Science of Logic, both written in Hegel's characteristically dense and obscure language, are often considered more as works of metaphysics than logic. But in

The Logic of Hegel’s Logic: An Introduct
✍ John W. Burbidge πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Broadview Press 🌐 English

George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel has seldom been considered a major figure in the history of logic. His two texts on logic, both called The Science of Logic, both written in Hegel's characteristically dense and obscure language, are often considered more as works of metaphysics than logic. But in

The Logic of Hegel's Logic: An Introduct
✍ John W. Burbidge πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2006 🌐 English

George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel has seldom been considered a major figure in the history of logic. His two texts on logic, both called The Science of Logic, both written in Hegel's characteristically dense and obscure language, are often considered more as works of metaphysics than logic. But in

The Logic of Hegel's 'Logic': An Introdu
✍ John W. Burbidge πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Broadview Press 🌐 English

<p> George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel has seldom been considered a major figure in the history of logic. His two texts on logic, both called <em>The Science of Logic</em>, both written in Hegel’s characteristically dense and obscure language, are often considered more as works of metaphysics than logic

An Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel
✍ Errol. E Harris πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› University Press Of America 🌐 English

From the Preface: The purpose of this commentary is to render Hegel’s Logic intelligible to the uninitiated and to dispel the numerous misconceptions which have accumulated around it and around Hegel's philosophy generally. No attempt has been made to trace historically the development of the Logic