✦ LIBER ✦

The linear no-threshold response: Why not linearity?

✍ Scribed by Sinclair, Warren K.

Book ID: 118036335
Publisher: American Institute of Physics
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 109 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0094-2405
DOI: 10.1118/1.598209

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Origin of the linearity no threshold (LN

Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose–response concept

✍ Edward J. Calabrese 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 277 KB

Test of the Linear-No Threshold Theory

✍ Bernard L. Cohen 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 64 KB

Linear no threshold (LNT)-the new homeop

Linear no threshold (LNT)-the new homeopathy

✍ Calabrese, Edward J.; Cook, Ralph R.; Hanekamp, Jaap C. 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 32 KB

Long-Term Consequences of the Linear-No-

Long-Term Consequences of the Linear-No-Threshold Dose-Response Relationship for Chemical Carcinogens

✍ Bernard L. Cohen 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 870 KB

Radiation Hormesis and the Linear-No-Thr

Radiation Hormesis and the Linear-No-Threshold Assumption || Nuclear Workers

✍ Sanders, Charles L. 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 🌐 German ⚖ 755 KB

Current radiation protection standards are based upon the application of the linear no-threshold (LNT) assumption, which considers that even very low doses of ionizing radiation can cause cancer. The radiation hormesis hypothesis, by contrast, proposes that low-dose ionizing radiation is beneficial.

Corrections to “Long-Term Consequences o

Corrections to “Long-Term Consequences of the Linear-No-Threshold Dose-Response Relationship for Chemical Carcinogens”

✍ Bernard L. Cohen 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 91 KB