<div>Between the early seventeenth and the mid-nineteenth century, the field of natural history in Japan separated itself from the discipline of medicine, produced knowledge that questioned the traditional religious and philosophical understandings of the world, developed into a system (called <i>ho
The knowledge of nature and the nature of knowledge in early modern Japan
โ Scribed by Marcon, Federico
- Publisher
- The University of Chicago Press
- Year
- 2016
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 429
- Series
- Studies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute Columbia University
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Between the early seventeenth and the mid-nineteenth century, the field of natural history in Japan separated itself from the discipline of medicine, produced knowledge that questioned the traditional religious and philosophical understandings of the world, developed into a system (called honzogaku) that rivaled Western science in complexity-and then seemingly disappeared. Or did it? In this book, Federico Marcon recounts how Japanese scholars developed a sophisticated discipline of natural history analogous to Europe's but created independently, without direct influence, and argues convincingly that Japanese natural history succumbed to Western science not because of suppression and substitution, as scholars traditionally have contended, but by adaptation and transformation.
โฆ Subjects
Nature study;Nature study--Japan--History;Science;Science--Japan--History;History;Nature study -- Japan -- History;Science -- Japan -- History;Japan -- History -- Tokugawa period, 1600-1868;Japan
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<div>Between the early seventeenth and the mid-nineteenth century, the field of natural history in Japan separated itself from the discipline of medicine, produced knowledge that questioned the traditional religious and philosophical understandings of the world, developed into a system (called <I>ho
<div><p>This book argues that we can only understand transformations of nature studies in the Scientific Revolution if we take seriously the interaction between practitioners (those who know by doing) and scholars (those who know by thinking). These are not in opposition, however. Theory and practic
<p><p>This book argues that we can only understand transformations of nature studies in the Scientific Revolution if we take seriously the interaction between practitioners (those who know by doing) and scholars (those who know by thinking). These are not in opposition, however. Theory and practice
<p><i>Sociable Knowledge</i> reconstructs the collaborations of seventeenth-century naturalists who, dispersed across city and country, worked through writing, conversation, and print to convert fragmented knowledge of the hyper-local and curious into an understanding and representation of Britain a
<p>Working with the technologies of pen and paper, scissors and glue, naturalists in early modern England, Scotland, and Wales wrote, revised, and recombined their words, sometimes over a period of many years, before fixing them in printed form. They built up their stocks of papers by sharing these