๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The judgmental approach. Foreword to the proceedings of the Konstanz symposium on social judgment

โœ Scribed by J. Richard Eiser

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1971
Tongue
English
Weight
115 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0046-2772

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Correction or comparison? The effects of
Correction or comparison? The effects of prime awareness on social judgments
โœ Marcus Maringer; Diederik A. Stapel ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 132 KB

## Abstract In previous research on the effects of accessible information on social judgments, divergent explanations have been offered for contrast effects that occur as a consequence of prime awareness. Some authors favor a comparison explanation, whereas others favor a correction explanation. In

On the Importance of Random Error in the
On the Importance of Random Error in the Study of Probability Judgment. Part II: Applying the Stochastic Judgment Model to Detect Systematic Trends
โœ DAVID V. BUDESCU; THOMAS S. WALLSTEN; WING TUNG AU ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 247 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Erev, Wallsten, and Budescu (1994) and Budescu, Erev, and Wallsten (1997) demonstrated that over-and underconยฎdence often observed in judgment studies may be due, in part, to the presence of random error and its eects on the analysis of the judgments. To illustrate this fact they showed that a ge

Contingent approaches to making likeliho
Contingent approaches to making likelihood judgments about polychotomous cases: the influence of task factors
โœ Paul D. Windschitl; Zlatan Krizan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 277 KB

## Abstract Two experiments tested the influence of three task factors on respondents' tendency to use normative, heuristic, and random approaches to making likelihood judgments about polychotomous cases (i.e., cases in which there is more than one alternative to a focal hypothesis). Participants e