𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

THE JUDGEMENT CALCULUS FOR INTUITIONISTIC LINEAR LOGIC: PROOF THEORY AND SEMANTICS

✍ Scribed by Silvio Valentini


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
958 KB
Volume
38
Category
Article
ISSN
0044-3050

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In this paper we propose a new set of rules for a judgement calculus, i.e. a typed lambda calculus, based on Intuitionistic Linear Logic; these rules ease the problem of defining a suitable mathematical semantics. A proof of the canonical form theorem for this new system is given: it assures, beside the consistency of the calculus, the termination of the evaluation process of every well‐typed element. The definition of the mathematical semantics and a completeness theorem, that turns out to be a representation theorem, follow. This semantics is the basis to obtain a semantics for the evaluation process of every well‐typed program. 1991 MSC: 03B20, 03B40.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fresh Logic: proof-theory and semantics
✍ Murdoch J. Gabbay πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 454 KB

In this paper we introduce Fresh Logic, a natural deduction style first-order logic extended with term-formers and quantifiers derived from the FM-sets model of names and binding in abstract syntax. Fresh Logic can be classical or intuitionistic depending on whether we include a law of excluded midd

Relating Natural Deduction and Sequent C
✍ Jeff Polakow; Frank Pfenning πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 851 KB

We present a sequent calculus for intuitionistic non-commutative linear logic (INCLL), show that it satisfies cut elimination, and investigate its relationship to a natural deduction system for the logic. We show how normal natural deductions correspond to cut-free derivations, and arbitrary natural

Simple proof of the completeness theorem
✍ Karim Nour; Christophe Raffalli πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 241 KB

We present a simpler way than usual to deduce the completeness theorem for the second-order classical logic from the ΓΏrst-order one. We also extend our method to the case of second-order intuitionistic logic.