Hilton, A.J.W. and H.R. Hind, The total chromatic number ofgraphs having large maximum degree, Discrete Mathematics 117 (1993) 127-140. The total colouring conjecture is shown to be correct for those graphs G having d(G)>21 V(G)I.
The irredundance number and maximum degree of a graph
✍ Scribed by B. Bollobás; E.J. Cockayne
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 104 KB
- Volume
- 49
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A vertex x in a subset X of vertices of an undirected graph is redundant if its dosed neighborhood is contained in the union of closed neighborhoods of vertices of X-{x}. In the context of a communications network, this means that any vertex that may receive communications from X may also be irdormed from X-{x}. The irredundance number it(G) is the minimum cardinaiity taken over all maximal sets of vertices having no redundancies. In this note we show that ir(G) ~> nl(2A -1) for a graph G having n vertices and maximum degree A.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In this article we prove that the total chromatic number of a planar graph with maximum degree 10 is 11. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 54: 91–102, 2007
For a connected graph G, let ~-(G) be the set of all spanning trees of G and let nd(G) be the number of vertices of maximum degree in G. In this paper we show that if G is a cactus or a connected graph with p vertices and p+ 1 edges, then the set {na(T) : T C ~-(G)) has at most one gap, that is, it
Consider I:andom graphs with n labelled vertices in which the edges are chosen independently and with a 6lxed probability p, 0 <p C 1. Let y be a fixed real number, q = 1p, and denote by A the maximum degree. Then
Let γ(G) and ir(G) denote the domination number and the irredundance number of a graph G, respectively. Allan and Laskar [Proc. 9th Southeast Conf. on Combin., Graph Theory & Comp. (1978) 43-56] and Bollobás and Cock- ayne [J. Graph Theory (1979) 241-249] proved independently that γ(G) < 2ir(G) for