The Irrational Atheist: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens
โ Scribed by Vox Day
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 320
- Edition
- 1ST
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A perceptive examination of modern day atheism, thisย book challenges the argument that religion and reason are fundamentally at oddsโa contention made by three prominentย scholars on atheism: Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Sam Harris. While other religious apologetics have challenged atheism on theological or biblical grounds, this book fights fire with fire, disproving the scholars' logic through modern, secular reason.ย Rigorously documentedย and supported by hard factual data, this careful analysis is critical reading for any religious person seeking to rebut the assertions of new atheists and essentialย information for any open-minded atheist who wants his beliefs to stand on firm ground.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>In <i>God and the New Atheism</i>, a world expert on science and theology gives clear, concise, and compelling answers to the charges against religion laid out in recent best-selling books by Richard Dawkins (<i>The God Delusion</i>), Sam Harris (<i>The End of Faith</i>), and Christopher Hitchens
<div><p>In this new book, Ian Markham analyzes the atheistic world view, opposing the arguments given by renowned authors of books on atheism, such as Richard Dawkins. Unlike other responses to the new atheism, Markham challenges these authors on their own ground by questioning their understanding o
In this new book, Ian Markham analyzes the atheistic world view, opposing the arguments given by renowned authors of books on atheism, such as Richard Dawkins. Unlike other responses to the new atheism, Markham challenges these authors on their own ground by questioning their understanding of belief
<span>The so-called New Atheists have a great deal of moral indignation at all the evil in the world, but, as apologist and theologian Douglas Wilson cheerfully points out, they have no moral basis for it whatsoever.</span><span><br><br>If we are merely the result of billions of years of matter in m