The (In)Validity of sensitivity and specificity
β Scribed by Irene Guggenmoos-Holzmann; Hans C. van Houwelingen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 112 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This paper is a legacy of the "rst author, and after her untimely death reconstructed by the second author as a tribute to Irene Guggenmoos's contribution to biostatistics. It discusses two di!erent views on diagnostic testing: the classical view in which sensitivity and speci"city of a diagnostic test are considered universal constants, and the more statistical point of view that focuses on predictive values. The di!erences between the two paradigms are outlined and practical examples are discussed to show that the familiar concepts of sensitivity and speci"city must be handled with care and not used indiscriminately.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In 1975, Galen and Gambino published a monograph entitled, Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Eficiency of Medical Diagnoses. ' This monograph received much attention, in part because it helped to introduce to a wider audience the concepts of sensitivity and specificity and the related conce
Requirements validation through feedback with users is of paramount importance in producing a high quality requirements specification document. Use of an executable formal specification offers an effective combination of formalism and pragmatism. This allows not only the systematic development of a