There is a new climate of optimism and creativity within the international finance scene at present, especially in relation to the poorer developing countries. The economies of donor countries and especially their financial markets have recovered since their post 9/11 trough. There is increasing evi
The International Finance Facility
✍ Scribed by HM Treasury
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 151 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0954-1748
- DOI
- 10.1002/jid.1131
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In January 2003 HM Treasury and the Department for International Development (DFID) launched a proposal for an International Finance Facility (IFF). The IFF is designed to ‘frontload’ aid to help meet the internationally agreed Millennium Development Goals. Estimates suggest that development assistance must be doubled and focused on the poorest countries if the Millennium Development Goals are to be met—an increase of at least $50 billion a year.^1^ At the UN's International Conference on Financing in Monterrey in 2002, donors pledged to provide an additional $16 billion a year from 2006. But this means a significant resource gap must be bridged if the Millennium Development Goals are to be reached. The Millennium Development Goals represent different indicators of the same basic poverty. Investments in different sectors must take place simultaneously to ensure sustainable progress. Education, health, access to water, roads and other infrastructure for growth must be tackled at the same time to ensure a lasting exit from poverty. Funding for debt relief should reinforce, not replace, funding to build a skilled work force and the infrastructure and capacity to trade. The IFF, as a stable financing vehicle, could provide the critical mass of additional and predictable funding needed to make lasting progress in all these areas. Donors are committed to reaching the target of 0.7 per cent ODA/GNI, but a number have fiscal constraints that will not allow them to increase aid levels in the short to medium term. The IFF should be seen as a complement to donors' long‐term commitment to 0.7 per cent ODA/GNI: it would meet the immediate need for resources to meet the MDGs as donors move towards the 0.7 per cent ODA/GNI target. © Crown Copyright 2004. Reproduced with the permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This paper comprises a brief review of current debates around the potential benefits and drawbacks of the proposed International Finance Facility (IFF). The IFF's main strength is clear: it recognizes the urgent need for significantly larger and more predictable aid flows, and suggests
## Abstract This commentary welcomes the ambitious vision underlying the IFF and suggests ways of avoiding four ‘elephant traps’ to which it is vulnerable; neglect of the poor in middle‐income countries, absorptive capacity, fungibility and knock‐on effects on interest rates. Absorptive capacity wo
## Abstract The United States has not recovered from the effects of the recent housing bubble. Nor is there an optimistic forecast for the future of housing—which is characterized by lack of demand, falling prices, and foreclosures. This is not a problem for other Organisation for Economic Co‐opera
In most developing countries, neither corporate nor government bonds are traded on open markets. Indeed, corporate bonds simply do not exist in many developing countries. Typically, the commercial banks are captive buyers of low yielding domestic government bonds by virtue of liquidity ratio require