๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science

โœ Scribed by Fouad Abd-El-Khalick; Norman G. Lederman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
411 KB
Volume
37
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-4308

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This study (a) assessed the inยฏuence of three history of science (HOS) courses on college students' and preservice science teachers' conceptions of nature of science (NOS), (b) examined whether participants who entered the investigated courses with a conceptual framework consistent with contemporary NOS views achieved more elaborate NOS understandings, and (c) explored the aspects of the participant HOS courses that rendered them more ``effective'' in inยฏuencing students' views. Participants were 166 undergraduate and graduate students and 15 preservice secondary science teachers. An open-ended questionnaire in conjunction with individual interviews, was used to assess participants' pre-and postinstruction NOS views. Almost all participants held inadequate views of several NOS aspects at the outset of the study. Very few and limited changes in participants' views were evident at the conclusion of the courses. Change was evident in the views of relatively more participants, especially preservice science teachers, who entered the HOS courses with frameworks that were somewhat consistent with current NOS views. Moreover, explicitly addressing certain NOS aspects rendered the HOS courses relatively more effective in enhancing participants' NOS views. The results of this study do not lend empirical support to the intuitively appealing assumption held by many science educators that coursework in HOS will necessarily enhance students' and preservice science teachers' NOS views. However, explicitly addressing speciยฎc NOS aspects might enhance the effectiveness of HOS courses in this regard. Moreover, the study suggests that exposing preservice science teachers to explicit NOS instruction in science methods courses prior to their enrollment in HOS courses might increase the likelihood that their NOS views will be changed or enriched as a result of their experiences with HOS.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Exploring a process view of students' kn
โœ Kathleen Hogan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 95 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The role that students' knowledge about the nature of science plays in their daily learning of science in school is not well understood. To explore this topic, two categories are introduced that classify how students' understanding of the nature of science has been operationalized. Distal knowledge

Preservice teachers' views of the nature
โœ Bruce C. Palmquist; Fred N. Finley ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 65 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The goals of this study were to determine preservice science teachers' views of the nature of science and to describe the changes in those views that occur during a teacher education program. Fifteen students in a postbaccalaureate secondary science teaching program at a large university participate

cover
โœ Adam Roberts ๐Ÿ“‚ Fiction ๐Ÿ“… 2016 ๐Ÿ› Palgrave Macmillan UK ๐ŸŒ English โš– 1 MB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views
cover
โœ Adam Roberts ๐Ÿ“‚ Fiction ๐Ÿ“… 2016 ๐Ÿ› Palgrave Macmillan UK ๐ŸŒ English โš– 1 MB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

This book is the definitive critical history of science fiction. The 2006 first edition of this work traced the development of the genre from Ancient Greece and the European Reformation through to the end of the 20th century. This new 2nd edition has been revised thoroughly and very significantly ex

The nature of science: A perspective fro
โœ Juli T. Eflin; Stuart Glennan; George Reisch ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 28 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Unfortunately, as we all know, the philosophy of science is a very difficult subject of byzantine complexity and unplumbed depth. (Ziman, 1994, p. 27) In a recent article in this journal, Brian Alters (1997) argued that, given the many ways in which the nature of science (NOS) is described and poor