𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The impact of reminder letters on attendance for breast cancer screening

✍ Scribed by C. Hayes; B. O’Herlihy; M. Hynes; Z. Johnson


Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
335 KB
Volume
168
Category
Article
ISSN
1863-4362

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Self-sampling versus reminder letter: Ef
✍ Anni Virtanen; Ahti Anttila; Tapio Luostarinen; Pekka Nieminen 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 235 KB

## Abstract Optimizing attendance and coverage of organized screening is needed to reduce cervical cancer incidence to previous lower levels. In our study, all nonparticipants in organized cervical cancer screening in 2008 in Espoo, Finland were randomized to receive a self‐sampling kit (1,130 wome

Long-term impact of previous breast biop
✍ James M. Goff; Mark Molloy; Maureen T. Debbas; Douglas A. Hale; David P. Jaques 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 282 KB

Approximately 80% of breast biopsies are performed for what proves to be a benign process. The patients who undergo these procedures should continue screening with breast physical examination and mammography. The long-term impact of breast biopsy on these screening modalities has not been well stud

UICC project on screening for cancer: Re
✍ N. E. Day; C. J. Baines; J. Chamberlain; M. Hakama; A. B. Miller; P. Prorok 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 586 KB

The 4th workshop of the UICC project on screening for cancer was held in Helsinki, Finland on April 7-9, 1986. In developed countries there are more data available from controlled trials on the effectiveness of screening for breast cancer than for any other cancer. Nevertheless, full information is

The impact of a breast cancer screening
✍ J. C. J. M. de Haes; Harry J. de Koning; Gerrit J. van Oortmarssen; Heleen M. E. 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 870 KB

Trials have shown that breast cancer screening is effective in reducing breast cancer mortality and gaining life-years. The question is whether taking into account the impact of a screening programme on quality of life would lead to a less positive view. Screening may have effects on quality of life