𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The Impact of Prophylactic Axillary Node Dissection on Breast Cancer Survival—A Bayesian Meta-Analysis

✍ Scribed by Richard K. Orr


Publisher
Springer
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
63 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
1068-9265

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Impact of axillary lymph node dissection
✍ Mona Sanghani; Ethan M. Balk; Blake Cady 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 336 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: The regional lymph node control and survival impact of axillary dissection in breast cancer has been the subject of multiple randomized trials, with various results. This study reviews and conducts a meta‐analysis of contemporary trials of axillary dissection in patients

The impact of radiation on early breast
✍ Seymour H. Levitt; Dorothee M. Aeppli; Mary E. Nierengarten 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 617 KB

BACKGROUND. A Bayesian statistical approach was used t o exairnine the effect of local control 0 1 1 survival of patients with carly breast carcinoina. METHODS. '['tie effect o f radiatioii on ovcwll survival was examined in the tour published randoiiiized trials on conservation surgery with or with

Impact on regional recurrence and surviv
✍ C. K. Axelsson; M. Düring; P. M. Christiansen; P. A. Wamberg; K. L. Søe; S. Møll 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Background This study examined whether axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with removal of many normal lymph nodes resulted in a reduced rate of axillary recurrence and better survival, as reported in recent studies. ## Methods The follow-up analyses were based on 8657 patients

The prognostic significance of the perce
✍ Pauline T. Truong; Eric Berthelet; Junella Lee; Hosam A. Kader; Ivo A. Olivotto 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 190 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy for women with T1–T2 breast carcinoma and 1–3 positive lymph nodes is controversial due to discrepancies in reported baseline locoregional recurrence (LRR) risks. This inconsistency has been attributed to variations in lymph node staging techniques, which