𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning

✍ Scribed by Steve Wheeler; Peter Yeomans; Dawn Wheeler

Book ID
110976058
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
65 KB
Volume
39
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1013

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Go
Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the β€œEarly Recognition” Problem
✍ Truchon, Jean-FranΓ§ois; Bayly, Christopher I. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› American Chemical Society 🌐 English βš– 465 KB

Many metrics are currently used to evaluate the performance of ranking methods in virtual screening (VS), for instance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the area under the accumulation curve (AUAC), the average rank of actives, the enrichment factor (EF), and the rob

Good practices for student learning: Mix
Good practices for student learning: Mixed-method evidence from the Wabash National Study
✍ Kathleen M. Goodman; Marcia Baxter Magolda; Tricia A. Seifert; Patricia M. King πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons βš– 226 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

King review both quantitative and qualitative data to understand students' college experiences and provide powerful information to guide educators.