The geriatric depression scale: Rater-administered or self-administered?
โ Scribed by Dr. Desmond O'Neill; Iris Rice; Patricia Blake; J. B. Walsh; Davis Coakley
- Book ID
- 102228369
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 307 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6230
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A need exists for a simple screening instrument for depression in the elderly which may be applicable in mild to moderate dementia. The GDS is a simple 30-item instrument whose role in screening for depression in dementia is controversial. This may relate to problems with its use as a self-administered questionnaire with unclear guidelines as to which subjects may be aided by the rater. We assessed the GDS as a staff-administered and a self-administered instrument in 100 elderly medical patients. There was a significant difference between the mean scores for each mode of presentation. This may account in part for the discrepancies between published studies on the GDS in dementia. In the absence of strict guidelines for the original mixed mode of application, the GDS should be considered as a staff-administered questionnaire exclusively. KEY woRDs-Geriatric Depression Scale, observer-rated scales, self-rated scales, depression.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Two self-rated questionnaires, SELFCARE (D) and Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) Scale, were compared in relation to their ecacy in detecting depression in 72 elderly patients attending general practitioners at a health centre in Liverpool, England. The sensitivity, speciยฎcity and overall misclassi
## Objective: To prospectively evaluate the reliability and validity of the collateral source geriatric depression scale (cs-gds) administered by telephone (t-cs-gds) in patients undergoing outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment. ## Subjects: Eighty-three geriatric patients evaluated in a
## Abstract The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a common screening tool for elderly depression in Hong Kong. This study aimed at (1) developing a standardized manual for the verbal administration and scoring of the GDSโSF, and (2) comparing the interโrater reliability between the standardized a