𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The evolutionary mechanism of cancer

✍ Scribed by Henry H.Q. Heng; Joshua B. Stevens; Steven W. Bremer; Karen J. Ye; Guo Liu; Christine J. Ye


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
295 KB
Volume
109
Category
Article
ISSN
0730-2312

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Identification of the general molecular mechanism of cancer is the Holy Grail of cancer research. Since cancer is believed to be caused by a sequential accumulation of cancer gene mutations, the identification, characterization, and targeting of common genetic alterations and their defined pathways have dominated the field for decades. Despite the impressive data accumulated from studies of gene mutations, epigenetic dysregulation, and pathway alterations, an overwhelming amount of diverse molecular information has offered limited understanding of the general mechanisms of cancer. To solve this paradox, the newly established genome theory is introduced here describing how somatic cells evolve within individual patients. The evolutionary mechanism of cancer is characterized using only three key components of somatic cell evolution that include increased system dynamics induced by stress, elevated genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity, and genome alteration mediated natural selection. Cancer progression represents a macro‐evolutionary process where karyotype change or genome replacement plays the key dominant role. Furthermore, the recently identified relationship between the evolutionary mechanism and a large number of diverse individual molecular mechanisms is discussed. The total sum of all the individual molecular mechanisms is equal to the evolutionary mechanism of cancer. Individual molecular mechanisms including all the molecular mechanisms described to date are stochastically selected and unpredictable and are therefore clinically impractical. Recognizing the fundamental importance of the underlying basis of the evolutionary mechanism of cancer mandates the development of new strategies in cancer research. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 1072–1084, 2010. Β© 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Genome based cell population heterogenei
✍ Christine J. Ye; Joshua B. Stevens; Guo Liu; Steven W. Bremer; Aruna S. Jaiswal; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 426 KB

## Abstract Cancer progression represents an evolutionary process where overall genome level changes reflect system instability and serve as a driving force for evolving new systems. To illustrate this principle it must be demonstrated that karyotypic heterogeneity (population diversity) directly c

Evolutionary mechanisms of senescence
✍ Brian Charlesworth πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 832 KB
Evolutionary constraints in the mechanis
✍ C. M. Visser πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1980 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 721 KB

Analysis of the possible evolution of flavin catalysis in succinate dehydrogenase suggests as the ultimate state an active site that bears one or more acid functions and uses the enediol form of the substrate rather than the carbanion as a nucleophile. In the case of flavoenzyme catalyzed oxidation

Simulation of evolutionary mechanism of
✍ Hongnan Zhou πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 261 KB

We devised a numerical model of planetary ring in which the inelastic collision and the gravitation between ring particles are considered. We adopt Hill's equations and the differential algorithm of circular mesh for computation of the particle orbits. The evolutional processes are presented for dif

Mechanical constraints canalizing the ev
✍ Dieter Stefan Peters πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1985 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 339 KB

A reconstruction of the anagenetic transformations from fins to tetrapod limbs is represented considering the self-evident mechanical constraints which must have limited the construction and thus the function and the transformation.