✦ LIBER ✦

The Ethics of Social Science Research

✍ Scribed by FRED D'AGOSTINO

Book ID: 115244990
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 819 KB
Volume: 12
Category: Article
ISSN: 0264-3758
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.1995.tb00120.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science R

Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics

✍ Kevin D. Haggerty 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 137 KB

Comment on Kevin D. Haggerty, “Ethics Cr

Comment on Kevin D. Haggerty, “Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics”

✍ Howard S. Becker 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 28 KB

The Ethnographer and the IRB: Comment on

The Ethnographer and the IRB: Comment on Kevin D. Haggerty, “Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics”

✍ Charles Bosk 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 37 KB

Written work: The social functions of Re

Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters

✍ Mary Dixon-Woods; Emma Angell; Richard E. Ashcroft; Alan Bryman 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 167 KB

Social contract theory and the ethics of

Social contract theory and the ethics of deception in consumer research

✍ N. Craig Smith; Allan J. Kimmel; Jill Gabrielle Klein 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 429 KB

## Abstract Deception of research participants is a pervasive ethical issue in experimental consumer research. Content analyses find as many as three‐fourths of published human participant studies in our field involved some form of deception, almost all of which employed experimental methodologies.

Conflicting notions of research ethics:

Conflicting notions of research ethics: The mutually challenging traditions of social scientists and medical researchers

✍ Klaus Hoeyer; Lisa Dahlager; Niels Lynöe 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 216 KB