attention than it has received from researchers interested in the evolution of cooperation. Research into the complexity of co-operation is still in its infancy, or at most its early childhood, and it is to be hoped that it will mature to include a wider range of models.
The Epistatic Handicap Principle Does Work
β Scribed by Steven Siller
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 325 KB
- Volume
- 191
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5193
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Unlike the conditional and revealing handicap mechanisms, the epistatic or ''Zahavian'' handicap mechanism of sexual selection has hitherto found scant support in the theoretical literature, as it appeared to function only under the most extreme conditions. Here, a continuous game theory model, a quantitative genetics model, and a three locus major gene model are presented which show that the epistatic handicap mechanism can function, independent of the Fisher process, under reasonable assumptions. Moreover, the game theory model illuminates the connection between the strategic and epistatic handicap mechanisms, and illustrates how sexual selection can cause traits to be canalised. The quantitative genetics and major gene models, together with a fourth model, are used to show that a general argument concerning indirect genetic correlations, which has appeared in a number of papers on sexual selection, is specious. The major gene model also illuminates an important distinction between two definitions of mutation bias.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The theory that sexual selection may cause females to select males with a handicap is analysed by means of a simple model. It is concluded that the proposed mechanism does not produce the results claimed for it, even allowing for sex-limited inheritance of the handicap.
The validity of the handicap principle has spawned much debate in spite of the existence of a formal treatment. Simple models constructed to further investigate the issue were able both to prove and to disprove some of its claims. Here I show with the aid of a more general model, which takes into ac