𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The employment selection interview: disparity among research-based recommendations, current practices and what matters to Human Rights Tribunals

✍ Scribed by Sheldene K. Simola; Simon Taggar; Geoffrey W. Smith


Book ID
102094507
Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
138 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0825-0383

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We surveyed Human Resources (HR) professionals (N = 301) on their use of structure in employment interviews. We compared these data with research‐based recommendations and with elements of interview structure considered important by Canadian Human Rights Tribunals. Contrary to research‐informed recommendations, HR practitioners and Human Rights Tribunals appear to attach little importance to job analysis as the foundation for developing interview questions and to interviewer training. While Tribunals and the established research literature on employment interviewing favour standardization, this is of lesser concern to Canadian HR practitioners. Finally, there was convergence on valuing behavioural questions and note‐taking, but not on valuing interview panels. Implications of our findings for research and practice are discussed. Copyright © 2007 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.