## Abstract The variation with latitude of the regression parameters __a__ and __b__ in the conventional equation of Ångström type between total solar radiation on a horizontal surface (__Q__) and hours of bright sunshine (__n__) has been examined. It has been shown that the slope of the relation
The empirical relation between solar radiation and hours of bright sunshine in the high-altitude tropics
✍ Scribed by J. Glover; J. S. G. McCulloch
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1958
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 348 KB
- Volume
- 84
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0035-9009
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The relationship between total solar radiation on a horizontal surface (Q), as measured by a pyranometer, and hours of bright sunshine (n), as measured by a Campbell‐Stokes recorder, has been examined and it is shown that there is little practical gain in weighting the hourly sunshine records by the sine of the apparent solar altitude.
In the non‐dimensional equation
values of a and b derived from daily records are shown to vary widely from month to month but their distribution appears to be substantially normal. Actual mean values of a and b, for a five‐year period (1938–1943) at Kabete, Kenya (altitude 6,000 ft) differed slightly but non‐significantly according to the length of period in which the data were grouped, the slope of the equation increasing with increased smoothing.
The sum of a and b has been shown to be approximately constant (≃ 0·82) at Kabete, where the optical air mass varies little throughout the year. For checking the consistency of the data from various parts of the world, it is essential to reduce the differing apparent transmission coefficients to standard measure. In practice, a simple correction to optical air‐mass unity has proved adequate for the records available at this station.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The relation between the duration of sunshine hours and radiation derived from ten years of daily records at Eskdalemuir and Cawood differs significantly from formulae in general use with the Penman formula. When used in the Penman formula with meteorological data from North East Englan