๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The effects of unilateral cochlear implantation on the tinnitus handicap inventory and the influence on quality of life

โœ Scribed by Hosam A. Amoodi; Paul T. Mick; David B. Shipp; Lendra M. Friesen; Julian M. Nedzelski; Joseph M. Chen; Vincent Y. W. Lin


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
317 KB
Volume
121
Category
Article
ISSN
0023-852X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis:

Cochlear implantation is now the standard of care in patients with significant sensorineural hearing loss. It is well known that patients with severe hearing loss also experience disabling tinnitus. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of cochlear implants on the perception of tinnitus using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI).

Study Design:

Prospective, longitudinal study of 142 cochlear implant patients.

Methods:

The THI was administered to 142 patients preโ€ and postimplantation. Outcome measures were obtained 12 months after the implantation. Secondary analyses to examine the correlation between changes in THI scores and outcome measures such as Hearing Handicap Inventory, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT), and shortโ€form 36 (SFโ€36) qualityโ€ofโ€life scores were performed.

Results:

Patients demonstrated statistically significant reduction of the THI scores including its subscales (P < .001). Prior to implantation, 37% of patients described their tinnitus as moderate to severe. Postoperatively, this percentage decreased to 10%. Cochlear implantation resulted in complete tinnitus suppression in 37% and tinnitus reduction in another 29% of patients. THI scores significantly correlated with three domains of the SFโ€36 qualityโ€ofโ€life questionnaire, namely social, emotional, and general health domains.

Conclusions:

Cochlear implants have a significant suppressive effect on tinnitus in 66% of implant users. Although the reduction in the subjectively perceived tinnitus was statistically significant, it did not correlate with HINT; however, it did correlate with three qualityโ€ofโ€life domains, more significantly for those whose pretreatment conditions were moderate or worse.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cochlear implantation has a positive inf
โœ Heidi Olze; Agnieszka J. Szczepek; Heidemarie Haupt; Ulrike Fรถrster; Nina Zirke; ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 373 KB

## Abstract ## Objectives: To determine the effect of cochlear implantation (CI) on healthโ€related quality of life (HRQoL), tinnitus, and psychological comorbidity in patients with severe to profound postlingual hearing loss and to analyze the relationship between these parameters. ## Study Desig

Modelling the effect of venous disease o
โœ D. Carradice; F. A. K. Mazari; N. Samuel; V. Allgar; J. Hatfield; I. C. Chetter ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 150 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background A clear understanding of the relationship between venous reflux, clinical venous disease and the effects on quality of life (QoL) remains elusive. This study aimed to explore the impact of venous disease, and assess any incremental direct effect of progressive disease on

The effects of HCV infection and managem
โœ Zobair Younossi; Jillian Kallman; John Kincaid ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 339 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Nothing to report. \* Cross-sectional mean differences between groups are shown. \*\*All studies measured HRQL using the 8 SF-36 Health Survey subscales and the 2 SF-36 summary component scores-the Mental Component score (MCS) and Physical Component score (PCS). โ€  (Adapted with permission from Spieg