✦ LIBER ✦

The Effectiveness of Traditional Versus Simulation ACLS Teaching Methods

✍ Scribed by Jason King

Book ID: 116416642
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 47 KB
Volume: 5
Category: Article
ISSN: 1876-1399
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2009.03.197

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of traditional versus high-fi

Comparison of traditional versus high-fidelity simulation in the retention of ACLS knowledge

✍ Bruce M. Lo; Alicia S. Devine; David P. Evans; Donald V. Byars; Olive Y. Lamm; R 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 174 KB

Comparison of traditional versus high-fi

Comparison of traditional versus high-fidelity simulation in the retention of ACLS knowledge

✍ Bruce M. Lo; Alicia S. Devine; David P. Evans; Donald V. Byars; Olive Y. Lamm; R 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 174 KB

Standardization is superior to tradition

Standardization is superior to traditional methods of teaching open vascular simulation

✍ Jonathan Bath; Peter Lawrence; Ankur Chandra; Jessica O'Connell; Sebastian Uijtd 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 889 KB

A Follow-up Study of Two Methods of Teac

A Follow-up Study of Two Methods of Teaching Mathematics: Traditional versus New Math

✍ Gene A. Walton; Kathryn Ellen Havens; Helen Dolores Johnson; Donald Paige 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 School Science and Mathematics Association 🌐 English ⚖ 169 KB

Assessing the effectiveness of medical s

Assessing the effectiveness of medical student teaching methods

✍ S. H. McClelland; B. R. Baxendale 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 46 KB

The Accuracy of Non-traditional versus T

The Accuracy of Non-traditional versus Traditional Methods of Forecasting Lumpy Demand

✍ Somnath Mukhopadhyay; Adriano O. Solis; Rafael S. Gutierrez 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 275 KB

## ABSTRACT Forecasting for inventory items with lumpy demand is difficult because of infrequent nonzero demands with high variability. This article developed two methods to forecast lumpy demand: an optimally weighted moving average method and an intelligent pattern‐seeking method. We compare them