๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The effect of liquidity constraints on futures hedging

โœ Scribed by Donald Lien


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
96 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

This article assumes that because of liquidity constraints, a hedge program will be terminated if the
cumulative loss from a futures position exceeds a certain threshold. The constraint leads to a smaller futures
position. If the hedger has a quadratic utility function, then the optimal futures position is constant regardless
of the parameter values and increases as the spot position or the conventional hedge ratio increases. When the
capital allocation is small, the hedger tends to ignore this restriction and chooses a larger position.
Consequently, the optimal position may decrease as the capital allocation increases. For a moderate capital
allocation, the optimal position increases with an increasing capital allocation. Similar properties are
established for exponential utility functions. ยฉ 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 23:603โ€“613,
2003


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Liquidity constraints and the hedging ro
โœ Kit Pong Wong ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 126 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This paper examines the behavior of the competitive firm under price uncertainty in general and the hedging role of futures spreads in particular. The firm has access to a commodity futures market where unbiased nearby and distant futures contracts are transacted. A liquidity constraint

Tax asymmetry and futures hedging under
โœ Kit Pong Wong ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 146 KB

This paper examines the optimal futures hedging decision of a firm facing uncertain income that is subject to asymmetric taxation with no loss-offset provisions. All futures contracts are marked to market and require interim cash settlement of gains and losses. The firm is liquidity constrained in t

The effect of the cointegration relation
โœ Lien, Da-Hsiang Donald ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 376 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

In many empirical studies, both spot and futures prices were shown to contain a stochastic trend. Consequently, it is necessary to examine the possible cointegration relationship between the two prices as suggested by the efficient markets hypothesis. The importance of incorporating the cointegratio

Liquidity and hedging effectiveness unde
โœ A. Andani; J. A. Lafuente; A. Novales ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 165 KB

## Abstract We analyze the hedging effectiveness of positions that replicate stock indexes using corresponding futures contracts through the application of a dynamic, stochastic hedging strategy proposed by Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Conclusive gains do not emerge in any of the markets

A note on the hedging effectiveness of f
โœ Joanne Hill; Thomas Schneeweis ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 328 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

T w o recent studies [Hill and Schneeweis (H&S) (forthcoming) and Dale (1981)l

Liquidity risk and the hedging role of o
โœ Kit Pong Wong; Jianguo Xu ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 171 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This study examines the impact of liquidity risk on the behavior of the competitive firm under price uncertainty in a dynamic two-period setting. The firm has access to unbiased one-period futures and option contracts in each period for hedging purposes. A liquidity constraint is imposed on the firm