## Abstract ## Objectives: To determine the differences between tympanic and extratympanic electrodes regarding recording technique, comfort and ease of execution of the exam, and quality of auditory potential tracings. ## Study Design: Prospective crossβsection investigation. ## Methods: Dete
β¦ LIBER β¦
The effect of electrode position in electrocochleography
β Scribed by J. A. J. DEANS; J. HILL; J. P. BIRCHALL; T. DAVISON; J. E. FITZGERALD; C. ELLIOTT
- Book ID
- 114720499
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 505 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1749-4478
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Comparison of the use of tympanic and ex
β
Ariane Solci Bonucci; Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
π
Article
π
2009
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 65 KB
Effect of Electrode Position on the Outc
β
Paulus Kirchhof; Martin Borggrefe; GΓΌnter Breithardt
π
Article
π
2003
π
Springer
π
English
β 100 KB
Effect of E-electrode position on Frank
β
Barbara Guller; Craig Reeves; Ralph E. Smith
π
Article
π
1974
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 430 KB
The effect of electrode position on flas
β
Brian A. Lupton; Peter K. H. Wong; Roberto Bencivenga; Alan Hill
π
Article
π
1990
π
Springer-Verlag
π
English
β 350 KB
We examined how changes in electrode position affected the visual evoked potential in 74 high-risk newborns using a multiple electrode technique. The variation in the visual evoked potential across the occiput was documented. Visual evoked potentials that were visible at one occipital electrode posi
The effect of gold foil electrode positi
β
A. McAllan; J. Sinn; G.W. Aylward
π
Article
π
1989
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 266 KB
Assessing the effect of uncertainty in i
β
Derfus, D.L.; Pilkington, T.C.
π
Article
π
1992
π
IEEE
π
English
β 619 KB