The effect of a videotaped arrest on public perceptions of police use of force
β Scribed by Eric S. Jefferis; Robert J. Kaminski; Stephen Holmes; Dena E. Hanley
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 1013 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0047-2352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In response to recent highly publicized violent encounters between the police and tile public, there has been a significant increase in research on police use Β’~force and citizen's perceptions qlthe police.
Relatively little empirical research, though, has addressed the role of the media in shaping public perceptions of police use of forte. This article helps fill this void by examining the impact o['a cont~vversial. violent arrest captured on videotape by a local news team and widely broadcast on hwal television in
Cincinnati. Using the Greater Cincinnati Sun'ey, bivariate and nudtivariate analyses are empho'ed to examine variations in perceptions of the reasonableness of the force used by police. Findings indicate that the videotaped arrest had a negative impact on citizens' perceptions of fi~rce used by police during arrest situations, but that the effect was substantially greater among non-Caucasians. Furthermore, over a ten-year period, non-Caucasians were consistently more likely than Caucasians to believe police used force excessively.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In contrast to traditional models of change developed in the private sector, change in publicβsector organizations often is initiated by noninclusive cultures, and the culture itself is the direct focus of the change effort. This article describes the strategies used by the Chief Commis
Abstraet--A public education campaign designed to increase impaired'drivers' subjective probability of arrest was implemented and evaluated. The campaign stressed implications of recent changes in the Canadian Criminal Code. A quasi-experimental design was used for evaluation such that in the two te
Advocates of juvenile curfews claim that they are useful for both minimizing victimization of young people, as well as a tool to aid in the deterrence of offenses by youthful offenders. Opponents claim that curfews have only interim, short-term effects on youth misconduct and violate the civil right