𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The distribution of the number of factors in a factorization

✍ Scribed by Doug Hensley

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
505 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-314X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Distribution of the Number of Factors in
Distribution of the Number of Factors in Random Ordered Factorizations of Integers
✍ Hsien-Kuei Hwang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 289 KB

We study in detail the asymptotic behavior of the number of ordered factorizations with a given number of factors. Asymptotic formulae are derived for almost all possible values of interest. In particular, the distribution of the number of factors is asymptotically normal. Also we improve the error

The number of triangles in 2-factorizati
The number of triangles in 2-factorizations
✍ Qidi Sui; Beiliang Du πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 137 KB

## Abstract Given an arbitrary 2‐factorization ${\cal F} = {F\_{1},F\_{2}, \cdots , F\_{v - 1/2}}$ of $K\_{v}$, let Ξ΄~__i__~ be the number of triangles contained in __F~i~__, and let δ = Σδ~__i__~. Then $\cal F$ is said to be a 2‐factorization with Ξ΄ triangles. Denote by Ξ”(__v__), the set of all Ξ΄

The number of trees with a 1-factor
The number of trees with a 1-factor
✍ J.W. Moon πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 608 KB

The asymptotic behaviour of the number of trees with a 1-factor is determined for various families of trees

Statistical assessment of a new criterio
Statistical assessment of a new criterion for selecting the number of factors in factor analysis
✍ A.Gustavo Gonzalez; D GonzΓ‘lez-Arjona πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 168 KB

Sir: It is well known that the most applied criteria for determining the number of underlying factors from a data matrix being factor-analyzed are the Malinowski's indicator @ND) function [l] and the Wold's double cross-validation (DCV) procedure [2]. Recently, we have proposed another proof that is