The Department of Defense Human factors standardization program
โ Scribed by G. Chaikin
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 456 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0003-6870
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The Department of Defense (DoD) Human Factors Standardization Program is the most far-reaching standardisation programme in the USA. It is an integrated component of the overall DoD Standardization Program. While only ten major documents are contained in the human factors standardisation area, their effects on human factors engineering programmes are profound and wide-ranging. Preparation and updating of the human engineering standardisation documents have grown out of the efforts of several military agencies, contractors, consultants, universities and individuals. New documents, engineering practice studies and revision efforts are continuously planned by the Tri-Service (Army, Navy, Air Force) Human Factors Standardization Steering Committee in collaboration with industry groups and technical societies. The present five-year plan and other standardisation documents are readily available for review and input by anyone with relevant interests. Human factors specialists and other readers of this journal may therefore influence the direction of the human factors standardisation programme and the content of its military specifications, standards and handbooks.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A s its major form of community involvement in its Installation Restoration Program (IRP), the Department of Defense (DOD) created Restoration Advis o y Boards (RABs). These RABs serve the purpose of providing citizen input into DOD's cleanup approaches to abandoned hazardous waste situations at its
initiatives related to both the
To provide readers of Applied Ergonomics with a selection of current ergonomics literature likely to be of direct practical value, abstracts are published selected from the collection held at the Ergonomics Information Analysis Centre. These abstracts are classified in a similar manner to the main