𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

The death of philosophy : reference and self-reference in contemporary thought

✍ Scribed by Thomas-Fogiel, Isabelle


Publisher
Columbia University Press
Year
2011
Tongue
English, French
Leaves
358
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Many philosophers have heralded the death of philosophy. Kant claimed responsibility for both its beginning and end, while Heidegger argued it concluded with Nietzsche. In the twentieth century, figures as diverse as John Austin and Richard Rorty have proclaimed philosophy's end, with some even calling for the advent of ""postphilosophy."" Transcending the analytical and continental divide, the death of philosophy Read more...


Abstract: Many philosophers have heralded the death of philosophy. Kant claimed responsibility for both its beginning and end, while Heidegger argued it concluded with Nietzsche. In the twentieth century, figures as diverse as John Austin and Richard Rorty have proclaimed philosophy's end, with some even calling for the advent of ""postphilosophy."" Transcending the analytical and continental divide, the death of philosophy is a topic as debated as the death of God. In an effort to make sense of all these conflicting positions-which often say as much about the philosopher as the subject itself

✦ Table of Contents


Content: The end of philosophy, or the paradoxes of speaking. Skeptical and scientific "post-philosophy" --
"Saying and the said": two paradigms for the same subject --
The antispeculative view: Habermas as an example --
Kant's shadow in the current philosophical landscape --
Challenging the "death of philosophy" : the reflexive a priori. A definition of the model: scientific learning and philosophical knowledge --
The model of self-reference's consistency --
The model's fecundity --
Beyond the death of philosophy --
The end of philosophy in perspective : the source of the reflexive deficit. The "race to reference" --
The tension between reference and self-reference in the Kantian system --
Helmholtz's choice as a choice for reference: the naturalization of critique --
Critique: a positivist theory of knowledge or existential ontology? --
Questioning the history of philosophy.

✦ Subjects


Philosophy, French -- 21st century. Philosophy, Modern -- 21st century. Reference (Philosophy) PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Modern PHILOSOPHY / General Philosophy, French. Philosophy, Modern.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The Death of Philosophy: Reference and S
✍ Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel; Richard A. Lynch πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Columbia University Press 🌐 English

<p>Philosophers debate the death of philosophy as much as they debate the death of God. Kant claimed responsibility for both philosophy's beginning and end, while Heidegger argued it concluded with Nietzsche. In the twentieth century, figures as diverse as John Austin and Richard Rorty have proclaim

The Philosophy of Exemplarity: Singulari
✍ Jakub MΓ‘cha πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2022 πŸ› Routledge 🌐 English

This book offers an original philosophical perspective on exemplarity. Inspired by Wittgenstein’s later work and Derrida’s theory of deconstruction, it argues that examples are not static entities but rather oscillate between singular and universal moments. There is a broad consensus that exempla

Tao and Trinity: Notes on Self-Reference
✍ Scott Austin πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2014 πŸ› Palgrave Pivot 🌐 English

<DIV>Tao and Trinity treats the Trinity as a philosophical notion coming to birth in Heraclitus, Parmenides, and Plato. All three attempt to treat the idea of an absolute source or unity of all things, and are driven in the direction of a first principle which is an instance of itself, an identity a

Reference-Dependent Preferences: A Theor
✍ Evelyn Stommel (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2013 πŸ› Gabler Verlag 🌐 English

<p><p>Most of our daily decisions are made under uncertainty and risk, without complete information about all relevant aspects. We all constantly make such decisions, from the simplest β€œshould I take my raincoat today?” to more serious examples, such as those on investment and portfolio decisions, h